检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:武果桃[1] 贺东昌[1] 樊振华[1] 邵文爱[2]
机构地区:[1]山西省农科院畜牧兽医研究所,太原030032 [2]山西省疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《中国公共卫生》2002年第3期314-315,共2页Chinese Journal of Public Health
摘 要:目的 对比空斑减少中和试验与反向被动血凝抑制试验在评价人血清抗乙脑病毒抗体时测定结果的异同。方法 对 4 5 0名 6~ 10岁儿童接种灭活乙脑疫苗前后的血清样本用两种方法进行了测定。结果 两种方法在测定免前人血清抗乙脑病毒抗体时存在显著性差异 ,在测定免后人血清抗乙脑病毒抗体时两者没有差异。结论 空斑减少中和试验比反向被动血凝抑制试验在测定人血清抗乙脑病毒抗体时灵敏。Objective In order to evaluate the difference between plaque reduction neutralization test(PRNT) and reverse passive hemagglutination inhibition(RPHI) test on human anti Japanese encephilitis antibodies.Methods Pre-and postimmunization sera collected from 450 children aged 6-10 years old after vaccination with inactivated JE were detected by both methods.Results No significant difference was found between these two methods when they were used to measure the post immunization sera,but significant differnce was found between these two methods when they were used to measure the preimmunization sera.Conclusion PRNT was more sensitive than RPHI when they were used to measure the anti Japanese Encephilitis antibodies.
关 键 词:空斑减少中和试验 反向被动血凝抑制试验 抗乙脑病毒抗体 血清 乙脑病毒
分 类 号:R373.31[医药卫生—病原生物学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56