检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈立骏 浦燕钧 童宗鹏 谌勇[1] Chen Lijun;Pu Yanjun;Tong Zongpeng;Chen Yong(Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai200240;Shanghai Marine Diesel Engine Research Institute,Shanghai201108)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学,上海200240 [2]七一一研究所,上海201108
出 处:《柴油机》2018年第6期37-39,共3页Diesel Engine
摘 要:以CCPP燃气轮机排气管路为研究对象,对采用激振器激励和力锤激励两种不同激励方式的模态试验进行比较分析。结果表明:两者得到的模态结果不完全相同。这是由于激振器及响应传感器等通常会对被测结构产生影响,特别是对轻质结构的影响较大。因此,对于文中所述的管路以及类似薄壁结构更推荐采用重锤轻敲的力锤法进行模态测试。Taking CCPP(Combined Cycle Power Plant)exhaust pipes of gas turbine as the object of study,the modal tests using different exciting forces,excitation exciter and force hammer were compared with each other and analyzed.The test results'show that the two modal test results are not completely the same.The reason is that the vibration exciter and its response sensor usually have influence on the tested structure,especially the light ones.Therefore,for the studied pipe and similar thin-wall structure,the force hammer method using gentle knocking is more recommended.
分 类 号:TK477.127[动力工程及工程热物理—动力机械及工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222