中山市三种职业流动人口艾滋病干预调查分析  

Analysis of AIDS intervention among migrant workers of three occupations in Zhongshan

作　　者：陈楚莹[1] 王曼[1] 来学惠[1] 舒波[1] 李晓莹[1] CHEN Chu-ying;WANG Man;LAI Xue-hui;SHU Bo;LI Xiao-ying(Zhongshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Zhongshan ,Guangdong528403,China)

机构地区：[1]中山市疾病预防控制中心

出　　处：《热带医学杂志》2018年第11期1529-1532,共4页Journal of Tropical Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较中山市三种职业流动人口艾滋病相关知识及行为的情况。方法采用两阶段分层抽样方法,对中山市建筑工人、企业工人、餐饮宾馆服务从业人员三种职业从业人员各220人进行调查,用SPSS进行数据分析。结果三种职业流动人口共调查660人,男性占57.87%(382/660),平均年龄(32.43±10.63)岁。建筑工人、企业工人和餐饮宾馆服务从业人员听说过艾滋病的比例分别为94.55%(208/220)、95.00%(209/220)、95.45%(210/220)。三种职业流动人口通过电视获得艾滋病知识的比例[33.18%(73/220)、38.18%(84/220)、51.36%(113/220)]均高于其他途径,建筑工人、企业工人和餐饮宾馆服务从业人员的艾滋病知晓率分别为23.18%(51/220)、34.09%(75/220)、35.00%(77/220),不同职业间的差异无统计学意义(χ~2=8.936,P>0.05)。对艾滋病感染者持无歧视态度的比例分别为5.00%(11/220)、7.27%(16/220)、10.45%(23/220),不同职业间的差异无统计学意义(χ~2=4.717,P>0.05)。三种职业最近一次与配偶或同居者发生性行为时使用安全套的比例差异有统计学意义(χ~2=27.219,P<0.05),建筑工人的最低,为21.80%(29/133);餐饮宾馆服务从业人员的最高,为50.00%(63/126)。三种职业流动人口发生商业性行为、临时性行为、肛交行为、吸毒的比例以及发生高危行为时安全套的使用比例差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三种职业接受艾滋病检测服务的情况差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),建筑工人接受检测前咨询的比例最高(100%),企业工人知晓检测机构的比例(25.45%)以及最近一年接受过HIV检测的比例(7.27%)最高。结论中山市三种职业流动人口艾滋病干预覆盖率和干预服务利用率低,干预效果不理想,应根据不同职业流动人口的特点持续开展艾滋病干预。Objective To compare the AIDS knowledge and related behavior among migrant workers of three occupations in Zhongshan city.Methods The two stage stratified sampling method was used to investigate 220 construction workers,220 enterprise workers and 220 restaurant workers in Zhongshan.SPSS was used for data analysis.Results A total of 660 migrants were recruited,with male accounting for 57.87%(382/660),and the mean age was (32.43±10.63)years old.The proportion of construction workers,enterprise workers and restaurant service workers who had heard of AIDS were 94.55% (208/220),95.00%(209/220),95.45%(210/220).Television was the main way for migrants to acquire AIDS knowledge [33.18%(73/220),38.18%(84/220),51.36%(113/220)1compare to other ways.The proportion of AIDS awareness among the construction workers,enterprise workers and restaurant workers were 23.18%(51/220),34.09%(75/220)and 35.00%(77/ 220),respectively,with no significant difference (χ^2=8.936,P>0.05).The proportion of non discriminatory attitude towards AIDS among three occupations were 5.00%(11/220),7.27%(16/220)and 10.45%(23/220),respectively,with no significant difference (χ^2=4.717,P>0.05).The rate of condom use with the spouse or cohabitant in the last time of different occupational migrants were significant different (χ^2=27.219,P<0.05);the rate of construction workers was the lowest,21.80% (29/133),and rate of the restaurant workers was the highest,50.00%(63/126).There were also no significant difference among three occupations in the proportion of commercial sex,temporary sex,anal sex,drug use and condom use during high- risk behavior (P>0.05).The situations of receiving AIDS detection services among three occupations were different (P<0.05).The proportion of accepting pre-test consultation in construction workers was the highest (100%).Enterpriseworkers had the highest proportion of awareness detection sites (25.45%)and having HIV test in the past year (7.27%). Conclusion The AIDS intervention coverage rate and service utilization rate among th

关 键 词：艾滋病 职业 流动人口 

分 类 号：R512.91[医药卫生—内科学]