舒芬太尼对ICU脓毒症患者应激激素及血流动力学参数的影响  

Effects of sufentanil on stress hormone and hemodynamic parameters in patients with sepsis in ICU

作　　者：邱敏珊 何丹 尹海燕[3] 叶小玲[3] Qiu Minshan;He Dan;Yin Haiyan;Ye Xiaolin(Department of Intensive Care Unit,Dongguan People's Hospital,Dongguan 523000,China;Department of Anesthesiology,Hengyang Women and Children Hospital,Hengyang 421000,China;Department of Intensive Care Unit,Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital,Medical College,Jinan University,G-uangzhou 510220,China)

机构地区：[1]东莞市人民医院重症医学科,广东省东莞523000 [2]衡阳市妇幼保健院麻醉科,湖南省衡阳421000 [3]暨南大学医学院附属广州红十字医院重症医学科,广州510220

出　　处：《中华急诊医学杂志》2018年第12期1376-1380,共5页Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(81871585);广东省自然科学基金(2018A030313058)。

摘　　要：目的 探讨舒芬太尼对ICU脓毒症患者应激激素及血流动力学参数的影响.方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法,选择2014年10月至2016年8月广州市红十字医院ICU收治的脓毒症患者46例,按随机数字表法分为对照组(C组)、芬太尼组(F组)和舒芬太尼组(S组).C组均给予积极治疗原发病、抗感染、营养支持及维持电解质平衡等综合治疗,F组和S组在C组的基础上分别加用芬太尼及舒芬太尼,镇痛目标为行为疼痛量表(BPS)≤3分.比较三组治疗前后应激激素[促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、糖皮质激素(GC)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)及肾上腺素(E)]、血流动力学参数[心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)及中心静脉压(CVP)]的变化,并对药物不良反应进行记录.计量资料组间比较采用方差分析或t检验,重复测量数据采用重复测量方差分析;计数资料采用 χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法.结果 三组治疗前、治疗后2、6 h NE和E水平均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与治疗前比较,C组治疗后2、6 h ACTH和GC水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),F组和S组治疗后2、6 h ACTH和GC水平均有不同程度下降(P<0.05).与C组比较,F组和S组治疗后2、6 h ACTH和GC水平均低于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但F组与S组组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与治疗前比较,三组治疗后2、6 h HR水平均有不同程度下降(P<0.05).与C组比较,F组和S组治疗后2、6 h HR水平均低于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但F组与S组组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与治疗前比较,三组治疗后2、6 h MAP水平均有不同程度升高.除F组治疗后2、6 h MAP水平差异无统计学意义外(P>0.05),C组和S组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).F组治疗后2、6 h MAP水平均低于C组和S组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),S组与C组组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 舒芬太尼对减轻ICU脓毒症患者的应激反应具有一定优势,其有效性及安全性与芬太Objective To investigate the effects of sufentanil on stress hormone and hemodynamic parameters in patients with sepsis in ICU. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was carried out to select 46 patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU of Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital from October 2014 to August 2016. The patients were randomly divided into the control group(group C), fentanyl group (group F) and sufentanil group (group S). Patients in group C were given active treatment of the primary disease, and anti-infection, nutritional support, maintenance of electrolyte balance and other comprehensive treatment. Patients in group F and group S were treated in the same way as group C, while fentanyl and sufentanil were applied separately into them. The analgesic goal was behavioral pain scale (BPS) ≤3 points. The changes of stress hormone [adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), glucocorticoids (GC), norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E)] and hemodynamic parameters [heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP)] before and after treatment were compared, and adverse drug reactions were recorded. The quantitative data were compared by analysis of variance or t test, and the repeated measurement data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. The enumeration data were compared by Chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method. Results There were no significant changes in the levels of NE and E before treatment and at 2 and 6 h after the treatment in the three groups (P>0.05). Compared with before treatment, there were no significant changes in ACTH and GC levels at 2 and 6 h after treatment in group C (P>0.05), and ACTH and GC levels decreased in group F and group S at 2 and 6 h after treatment (P<0.05). Compared with group C, the levels of ACTH and GC in group F and group S were lower than those in group C at 2 and 6 h after treatment (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between group F and group S (P>0.05). Compared with before treatment, the levels

关 键 词：舒芬太尼 脓毒症 应激激素 血流动力学 

分 类 号：R459.7[医药卫生—急诊医学]