检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李永吉 王善平[2] Li Yongji;Wang Shanping
机构地区:[1]湖南大学工商管理学院 [2]湖南师范大学
出 处:《财经科学》2018年第11期95-109,共15页Finance & Economics
基 金:财政部会计名家培养工程“精准扶贫中的代理问题及审计治理研究”(财会[2016] 15号)的资助
摘 要:大股东同业竞争是引发大股东与中小股东之间利益冲突的重要动因。本文利用2003-2016年上市公司的同业竞争数据,考察了同业竞争对上市公司技术创新的影响。研究发现:存在同业竞争关系的上市公司投入的研发费用、申请的专利数量与质量,以及专利-研发费用比均低于不存在同业竞争关系的公司。进一步分析发现,大股东的股权流通难以缓解同业竞争对上市公司技术创新的不利影响。结果表明:同业竞争抑制了上市公司的创新活动。Horizontal competition of majority shareholders is a significant reason for interest conflicts between majority shareholders and minority shareholders. This study analyzed the adverse effects of horizontal competition on technological innovation of the listed companies based on the data of horizontal competition of the listed companies from2003 to 2016. The finding of this study is that the R&D expenses, quantity & quality of patent applications and the ratio of patents to R&D expenses for the listed companies involved in horizontal competition are all lower than those of the listed companies not involved in horizontal competition. Through further analysis, it is found that it is difficult for the equity circulation of the majority shareholders to mitigate adverse effects of horizontal competition on the technological innovations of the listed companies. The result of this study shows that horizontal competition holds back technological innovation of the listed companies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.154.24