检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐显芬 Xu Xianfen
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学历史学系周边国家研究院,教授上海200241
出 处:《中共党史研究》2018年第11期76-86,共11页CPC History Studies
基 金:国家社科基金年度项目"20世纪70年代中美日三边联动关系研究"(14BSS029);上海市浦江人才计划项目(13PJC036)的阶段性成果
摘 要:《中日和平友好条约》的缔约谈判经历了预备谈判、一度中断后的重启缔约谈判以及正式缔约谈判三个阶段,谈判的分歧点聚焦于反霸条款。这个分歧反映了中日两国不同的东亚秩序观:中国在设定主要敌国的基础之上,旨在把日本拉入国际反霸统一战线中;日本则坚持日美关系为"基轴"的基本外交政策,采取"日中是日中,日苏是日苏"的方略,只与中国发展重视实务往来的友好合作关系。当前中日两国的战略猜疑,根源就在于缺乏安全保障问题上的制度性安排。The contract negotiations for the Sino-Japanese Treaty of Peace and Friendship underwent three stagespreparatory negotiations,resumption of contract negotiations after a period of suspension,and formal contract negotiations. The disagreements during the negotiations focused on the anti-hegemony clauses. Such disagreements reflected the different views in China and Japan of the East Asian order. On the basis of setting up major enemy country,China aimed to bring Japan into the international anti-hegemony united front; Japan adhered to the basic foreign policy in Japan-US relations as the"base axis,"and adopted the Japanese and Soviet strategies of"JapanChina is Japan-China,and Japan-Soviet Union is Japan-Soviet Union"and they developed friendly and cooperative relations with China,attaching great importance to practical exchanges. The current strategic suspicions in Sino-Japanese relations lies in the lack of institutional arrangements for security issues.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.81.94