检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李峰[1] 罗良清[1] 潘露露 LI Feng;LUO Liang-qing;PAN Lu-lu(Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330013,China)
出 处:《江西财经大学学报》2018年第6期82-93,共12页Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“贫困退出考核评估的统计测度研究”(17ZDA094).
摘 要:如何精准识别贫困户和脱贫户是脱贫攻坚工作中经常遇到的问题,合适的剥夺指标和合理的权重设置有助于减少模糊地带。通过对CFPS2014年的数据分析,对其中涉及贫困的指标逐一梳理,进而对初步筛选出的指标以项目反应理论进行分析,确定9个难度适宜、指向清晰的指标。在指标难度的基础上设置相应权重,并和等权方法比较各指标贡献率和筛选贫困家庭的比例,发现难度权重的方法可以减少"漏报"贫困家庭的情况。How to accurately identify poor households and poverty alleviation households is a problem often encountered in poverty alleviation work.Appropriate deprivation indicators and reasonable weight setting can help reduce the blurring zone.Through the analysis of CFPS data in 2014, this paper firstly sorts out the indicators related to poverty one by one,then it conducts an analysis of the initially selected indicators with the project response theory,so as to determine the nine indicators which are appropriate in difficulty and clear in direction.Based on the difficulty of the indicator, the corresponding weights are set,and the contribution rate of each indicator is compared with the equal weight method,so as to sift the proportion of the needy families.It is found that the 'difficulty weight method can reduce the failures in reporting the poor families.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38