谦抑理念下互联网服务行业经营者集中救济调适  

Adjustment of Remedies for Concentration of Undertakings in the Internet Industry under the Concept of Necessity

作　　者：孙晋[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2018年第6期151-171,共21页China Legal Science

基　　金：国家2011计划司法文明协同创新部分研究成果;中国法学会2017年度部级研究一般课题《新经济领域的经营者集中审查问题研究》(项目批准号:CLS[2017]C12)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：互联网服务行业有着不同于传统行业的明显特征,决定了其在竞争效果评估、救济措施选择及其实施三个阶段的适用中与传统行业大相径庭。“市场决定论”蕴涵了政府干预的“谦抑理念”;互联网服务行业适用经营者集中救济,在执法原则上宜确立谦抑理念实现包容审慎监管。在第一阶段的竞争效果评估中,宜弱化市场份额因素,加强市场进入和效率等因素的考量;在第二阶段的救济方式选择中,市场结构上天然具有“冒尖效应”的互联网服务行业,应当优先选择行为性救济;第三阶段的救济实施,应开放网络平台和关键基础设施、持续信息披露、引入监督受托人;最后,当行为性救济实施过程中出现法律争议时,除了传统的诉讼和调解外,可优先考虑适用仲裁机制。当下反垄断执法体制重组为理念转型和执法改进提供了契机和便利。Since the internet industry has its own characteristics,it causes clear differences in three application stages:competition effect evaluation,choice of remedy measures and implementation of remedy measures.Market Determinism contains the"concept of necessity"with government intervention;the internet industry applies remedies for concentration of undertakings and it is suggested that the concept of necessity should be extended to antitrust enforcement.In the first stage,it is advisable to weaken the consideration of market share and strengthen the consideration of market access and efficiency.In the second stage,because of the internet industry’s special effect in market structure,we should give priority to the behavioral relief.In the third stage,we should open up internet platform and critical infrastructure,continue to disclose information and introduce regulatory trustee.Lastly,when legal disputes happen in implementation process of behavioral relief,we can give priority to arbitration besides litigation and mediation.The reorganization of current antitrust law enforcement system provides opportunities and convenience for the transformation of concept and the improvement of law enforcement.

关 键 词：互联网服务行业 经营者集中救济 谦抑理念 竞争效果评估 行为性救济 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]