检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏国安[1] 薛建阳[2] WEI Guo-an;XUE Jian-yang(He'nan Technical College of Construction,450000,Zhengzhou,China;Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology 710055,Xi'an,China)
机构地区:[1]河南建筑职业技术学院,郑州450000 [2]西安建筑科技大学,西安710055
出 处:《建筑技术》2018年第12期1304-1307,共4页Architecture Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(59878043);陕西省重点实验室建设项目(05JS17)
摘 要:简要介绍了美国的LEED体系和我国的GB 50378《绿色建筑评价标准》,对比分析中美绿色建筑评价体系的政策环境后发现,政府政策在中美两国绿色建筑发展过程中均至关重要,不同之处在于美国LEED体系主要依靠市场机制驱动,而我国GB 50378《绿色建筑评价标准》与市场机制的结合尚未完善。为改善现状,提出了政策应协同作用、政策应聚焦市场、政策应切实落地等建议,以加快推进绿色生产与消费的政策导向。A brief introduction to the US LEED system and China's GB 50378 Green Building Evaluation Standards,a comparative analysis of the policy environment of the Sino-US green building evaluation system,found that government policies are crucial in the development of green buildings in China and the United States.The difference is that the US LEED system mainly relies on market mechanism,and the combination of GB 50378 Green Building Evaluation Standard and market mechanism is not perfect.In order to improve the status quo,suggestions such as policy should be synergistic,policies should focus on the market,and policies should be implemented in order to accelerate the policy orientation of green production and consumption.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.190.49