检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚建龙[1] 林需需 YAO Jianlong;LIN Xuxu(Shanghai college of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院,上海201701
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2018年第6期62-70,共9页Journal of Henan Police College
摘 要:对修正案的过度推崇混淆了刑法渊源与刑法修改方式,强化了排斥单行刑法与附属刑法的结果,固化了单一化刑法渊源立法模式,存在诸多无法弥补的缺陷。反思刑事立法理论和实践,我国目前没有必要"削足适履"维持单一刑法典立法模式。值得注意的是,世界范围内多样化刑法渊源是主流趋势,忽视现实片面追求刑法大一统的形式值得商榷。立足立法技术和社会现实,我国宜恢复单行刑法与附属刑法,重新采用多样化刑法渊源。Due to the excessive promotion of the amendment,there are many defects of confusing the sources and modifications of the criminal law,strengthening the exclusion between the separate criminal law and the accessory criminal law and forming an inflexible model of sources of criminal law.There is no need in China to maintain the single criminal legislative model in terms of the theory and practice since the mainstream is to diversify the sources of criminal law worldwide.Thus,it is debatable to maintain the unification of the criminal law ignoring the reality.Based on legislative technique and social reality,China should readopt the diversified sources of the criminal law by resuming the separate criminal law and the accessory criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15