论互联网电子证据的保管  

On the Custody of Internet Evidence

作　　者：冯姣 Feng Jiao

机构地区：[1]浙江财经大学法学院

出　　处：《南京大学法律评论》2018年第1期297-316,共20页Nanjing University Law Review

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“中国特色社会主义司法制度的模式、规律与改革方向研究”(14AKS009)

摘　　要：互联网电子证据的出现,对现有的证据保管制度提出了新的挑战。从规范层面来看,存在证据保管制度程序性要件说明的缺失;从实践来看,各地证据保管实践存在良莠不齐的情形:以快播案为例;其在接收、鉴定以及保管过程中均无法确保互联网电子证据的原始性和完整性。互联网电子证据保管制度的确立,可以确保证据的同一性、完整性和可靠性,借此提高诉讼的效率。我国互联网电子证据保管制度的完善,需要从程序性和技术性两方面展开。The emerging of Internet evidence has challenged the current evidence custody system.The regulations have not paid enough attention tothe custody procedures;and different places frequently have differenf ways to deal with the custody issues.In the Qvod case,during the process of investigation, forensics and custody,the integrity and primariness cannot be ensured.By setting up sophisticated custody system,the reliability,integrity and oneness of Internet evidence would be guaranteed,and it will definitely improve the judicial efficiency.To advance the custody system,procedural and technical perspectives should be deliberated.

关 键 词：互联网电子证据 保管制度 保管链 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]