《反垄断法》第十四条第(三)项法律适用问题探讨与澄清  

The Discussion and Clarification for the Application of Article 14(3) of China Anti-Monopoly Law

作　　者：田辰[1] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学

出　　处：《竞争政策研究》2018年第5期72-81,共10页Competition Policy Research

摘　　要：立法规则的缺失与实践中缺乏指导案例,使得我国《反垄断法》第十四条第(三)项,即针对"纵向非价格垄断协议"之规定,在法律适用问题上存在误区,产生了相应问题;而从商业策略角度来说,上述问题也在一定程度上增加了这一规定被滥用的风险,进而成为某些市场主体牵制、打击竞争对手的手段与策略。然而,判断某一行为是否属于垄断行为的根本标准,仍需要评估其能否产生排除、限制竞争的效果。因此,立法设计的缺陷并不足以成为《反垄断法》第十四条第(三)项作为"兜底条款",被无条件适用的借口;而更为细化的指南或细则不仅将在某种程度上弥补实践中缺乏指导案例的现状,更加有助于这一条款和《反垄断法》的正确适用,以及对于垄断行为本质的理解。Since the absence of legislative rules and the lack of precedents in practice, there are always some misunderstandings for the application of Article 14(3) of China Anti-Monopoly Law("this provision"), which is socalled "Vertical Non-Price Restraints" or the "the Miscellaneous Provision of Vertical Monopolistic Agreements". From the perspective of conducting commercial strategy of enterprises, the relating issues may increase the risks for abusing this provision in practice, and subsequently become a kind of method to restrain and attack their competitors. However, the substantial standard for estimating the monopolistic conducts is whether the corresponding conducts eliminate or restrict competition in the relevant market. Therefore, the absence of legislative rules cannot constitute the excuse for the unconditional application of this provision; contrarily, the guidance or regulation which include more detailed rules will not only makes up for deficiency of the lack of precedents in practice, but also be helpful to the accurate application of this provision and even the implementation of China Anti-Monopoly Law, as well as the understanding of the essential of monopolistic conducts.

关 键 词：纵向非价格垄断行为 合理原则 提高竞争对手成本理论 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]