留存抑或废除:关于贪污贿赂罪没收财产刑的重新审视  

Retain or Abolish:Re-examination of the Confiscation of Property Punishment for Corruption and Bribery

作　　者：李海滢[1] 王延峰 Haiying Li;Yanfeng Wang(Jilin University,Changchun Jilin 130000)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《警学研究》2018年第5期33-40,共8页Police Science Research

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"坚持依法治国与制度治党;依规治党统筹推进研究"(17JZD003)阶段性研究成果;国家社科基金"犯罪资产海外追缴的中国立场与路径选择研究"(18BFX102)阶段性研究成果;吉林省社科基金"吉林省腐败犯罪附加刑适用问题研究"(2017B88)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在贪污贿赂罪中,诸多罪名都规定了没收财产刑,然而通过对其他国家刑法典的查阅可以发现大部分国家已经废除了此种刑罚。同时,由于与世界上的主流规定不同,也使得我国在请求外国进行刑事司法协助中面临窘境。这都让我们不得不重新审视贪污贿赂罪中没收财产刑的存废问题。而从刑罚存在的正当性、刑法谦抑性、刑罚轻缓化、责任主义原则和追缴犯罪分子海外资产等角度分析,我国贪污贿赂罪中,没收财产刑应当废除。I n the crime of corruption and bribery,many accusations stipulate the confiscation of property,but through inspecting other countries'criminal codes,it can be found that most countries have abolished it.At the same time,because it is different from the mainstream regulations in the world,it makes our country face a dilemma in requesting foreign countries for criminal justice assistance,so we must re-examine the issue of the abolition of property penalties in the crime of corruption and bribery. From the perspective of the legitimacy of punishment,the modesty of criminal law,the mitigation of punishment,the principle of responsibility and the recovery of criminal assets overseas assets,the crime of confiscation of property should be abolished in the crime of corruption and bribery in China.

关 键 词：贪污贿赂罪 没收财产刑 刑罚 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]