盐酸奥普力农对心脏瓣膜置换术后患者心功能改善及血流动力学的影响  

Effects of oprinon hydrochloride on cardiac function improvement and hemodynamics in patients after cardiac valve replacement

作　　者：程行东 舒礼良[1] 黄辰[1] 朱效华[1] 黄功成 徐敬[1] Cheng Xingdong;Shu Liliang;Huang Chen;Zhu Xiaohua;Huang Gongcheng;Xu Jing(Department of Cardiovascular Surgery 3, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan, China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学第一附属医院心血管外三科,河南郑州450000

出　　处：《中国中西医结合急救杂志》2018年第6期594-598,共5页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care

摘　　要：目的评价盐酸奥普力农对心脏瓣膜置换术后是否能增加心脏泵血功能和稳定血流动力学,防治术后常见并发症的有效性和安全性。方法选择2018年1月至8月在郑州大学第一附属医院行心脏瓣膜置换术后患者62例,以使用奥普力农的32例患者为观察组,以使用米力农的30例患者为对照组。两组均接受基础治疗,观察组在此基础上给予盐酸奥普力农注射液持续静脉泵入48h,对照组在此基础上给予米力农注射液持续静脉泵入48h。观察两组用药前后生命体征(血压、心率、呼吸)变化情况,心功能改善情况,血流动力学指标变化情况,记录生化指标变化情况,不良反应发生情况。出院后随访1个月,观察心血管事件发生情况(恶化、再住院、死亡)。结果两组治疗后左室射血分数(LVEF)、中心静脉压(CVP)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、N-末端B型钠尿肽前体(NT-proBNP)、乳酸、血肌酐(SCr)和血钠、钾水平与治疗前比较差异均无统计学意义〔LVEF:对照组为0.52±0.09比0.60±0.09,观察组为0.62±0.12比0.50±0.11;CVP(mmHg,1mmHg=0.133kPa):对照组为11.2±2.8比13.0±2.9,观察组为13.0±2.5比10.5±3.6;SaO2:对照组为0.98(0.90,0.99)比0.99(0.98,1.00),观察组为0.95(0.94,0.98)比0.96(0.90,1.00);PaO2(mmHg):对照组为100.5(63.8,135.3)比99.5(82.3,179.5),观察组为95.0(85.5,129.0)比75.5(59.0,138.3);NT-proBNP(pg/L):对照组为1.45(1.34,3.31)比0.92(0.42,1.81),观察组为0.47(0.35,1.37)比2.07(1.27,4.44);乳酸(mmol/L):对照组为3.6(2.4,4.5)比1.4(1.2,3.1),观察组为1.3(1.1,2.1)比3.1(1.4,3.7);SCr(μmol/L):对照组为106.7±35.9比84.4±20.3,观察组为96.5±40.7比77.1±23.1;钠(mmol/L):对照组为141.4±7.2比143.6±4.2,观察组为142.9±3.6比140.5±4.5;钾(mmol/L):对照组为4.6±0.9比4.8±0.6,观察组为4.8±0.6比4.1±0.6,均P>0.05〕;观察组与对照组治疗后外周动脉压(PAP)、白细胞计数(WBC)、血红蛋白(Hb)、血小板计数(PLT)、丙氨酸�Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oprinon hydrochloride in increasing cardiac pump function and stabilizing hemodynamics and preventing common complications after cardiac valve replacement. Methods Sixty-two patients were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January to August 2018 to undergo cardiac valve replacement operation, post-operatively, 32 patients using oprinon hydrochloride were in the observation group and 30 patients using milrinone were in the control group. Both groups received basic treatment, additionally the observation group was given oprinon hydrochloride intravenous pump injection for48 hours and the control group was given milrinone intravenous pump injection for 48 hours. The changes of vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate), cardiac function, hemodynamics, biochemical indexes, electrocardiogram, cardiac color Doppler ultrasound and adverse reactions were observed before and after treatment in the two groups. The incidence of cardiovascular events (worsening, re-hospitalization and death) was followed up 1 month after discharge. Results The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), central venous pressure (CVP), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), N-terminal B-type natriuria (NT-proBNP), lactic acid, serum creatinine (SCr), blood sodium and potassium of the two groups after treatment were not statistically significant compared with those before treatment [LVEF: the control group was 0.52±0.09 vs. 0.60±0.09, the observation group was 0.62±0.12 vs. 0.50±0.11; CVP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): the control group was 11.2±2.8 vs. 13.0±2.9, the observation group was 13.0±2.5 vs. 10.5±3.6; SaO2: the control group was 0.98 (0.90, 0.99) vs. 0.99 (0.98, 1.00), the observation group was 0.95 (0.94, 0.98) vs. 0.96 (0.90, 1.00); PaO2 (mmHg): the control group was 100.5 (63.8, 135.3) vs. 99.5 (82.3, 179.5), the observation group was 95.0 (85.5, 129.0) vs. 75.5 (59.0, 138.3); NT-proBNP (p

关 键 词：心脏瓣膜置换术 奥普力农 米力农 

分 类 号：R542.5[医药卫生—心血管疾病]