检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李辉[1] 游宾[1] 叶鑫[1] LI Hui;YOU Bin;YE Xin(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Beijing Chaoyang Hospital,Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing,100020,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院胸外科,北京100020
出 处:《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》2019年第1期35-41,共7页Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
摘 要:胸外科手术的规范化和质量控制一直缺乏统一的标准。理想的手术质量评估标准应该具备以下几个条件:客观公正,内容专业,结构细化,可量化。客观结构化临床技能评估(OSATS)是近年来发展形成的对手术操作质量进行考评的可靠方法。本文通过回顾相关文献,就OSATS发展历程及其在胸外科手术技术评价和质量控制方面的前景做一综述。It has been absent from an accepted criteria for normalization and quality control of the thoracic surgery until now. The ideal assessing instrument which will be used to evaluate the technical skills and surgical procedures should present a few vital characterizations below: objectivity, speciality in the content, detailed structure, and quantifiability. Objective structured assessment of technical skills(OSATS) has developed as a reliable method of surgical skills measurement. This article focuses on the history of OSATS and its prospect in the thoracic surgery area by reviewing relevant literatures.
关 键 词:胸外科 客观结构化临床技能评估 质量控制
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4