检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李纲[1] 王晓[1] 郭洋 Li Gang;Wang Xiao;Guo Yang(Center for Studies of Information Resources,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;School oflnformation Management,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学信息资源研究中心,武汉430072 [2]华中师范大学信息管理学院,武汉430079
出 处:《数据分析与知识发现》2018年第11期54-63,共10页Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"突发公共卫生事件社交媒体信息主题演化与影响力建模"(项目编号:71603189)的研究成果之一
摘 要:[目的]分析与测算微信群成员之间的隐性关系及其强度,并与显性关系相结合得到全关系以完善微信群内部社会网络刻画。[方法]以微信趣缘群为例,研究群成员之间基于话题的合作共现并将其作为隐性关系的测量指标,借鉴Salton指数计算关系强度。分析成员的话题讨论参与情况和隐性关系分布,对比显性关系网络和全关系网络。[结果]话题讨论情况可以清晰反映群成员的亲疏关系;与成立目的有关的话题讨论有助于经营和维护成员关系。[局限]对群成员的讨论参与度和话题贡献度有进一步详细测量的优化空间。[结论]综合显性关系与隐性关系的全关系网络对微信群内部关系网络结构的刻画相较于显性关系更加全面,且能够揭示出更丰富的信息。[Objective] This paper analyzes the implicit relationship among WeChat group members and meaures its strength, which is also combined with their explicit relatinship to describe the social network characteristics of WeChat groups. [Methods] First, we collected chatting records from one WeChat interest group. Then, we used the co-occurrence to measure the implicit relationship and the salton index to calculate their strength. Third, we analyzed the discussion participation to explore the implicit-relationship distribution. Finally, we compared the full-relationship network with explicit-relationship network. [Results] We found that topic discussion clearly reflected relationship among group members. Posting more relevant topics helps to manage and maintain membership. [Limitations] More research is needed to measure goup members’ engagement. [Conclusions] The full-network with implicit and explicit relationship reveals more insights on the structure of WeChat group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.247.220