检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳卸林 葛爽 LIU Xielin;GE Shuang(School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Science,Beijing 100190,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2018年第11期3-18,共16页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71872170)
摘 要:我国经济正处于从“投资驱动”向“创新驱动”的转型时期,创新驱动发展亟需新的经济驱动思考。但新古典增长理论无法对影响技术进步的机制和经济增长率的差异作出解释,新熊彼特增长理论却难以量化。基于熊彼特增长理论的角度,借鉴新古典经济增长理论,以1998-2016年间中国省际面板数据,对我国创新驱动经济发展的核心要素、关键内在机制进行量化实证研究。结果表明:风险投资、产业多样性和地方企业集聚度均通过促进知识溢出和流动促进经济增长。外来流动人口的文化差异造成知识扩散阻碍效应,不利于经济增长。企业对高校、研究机构的研发投入因创新成果的低转化率无法弥补其挤占生产投入产生的机会成本,故而抑制经济增长。China's economy is in the transition period from "investment-driven"to "innovation-driven".Innovation-driven development is in urgent need of new economy-driven thinking.However,the neoclassical growth theory cannot explain the mechanism affecting technological progress and the difference in economic growth rate, while the neo-schumpeterian growth theory is difficult to quantify.Based on the s neo-schumpeterian growth theory and the neoclassical growth theory,this paper conducts a quantitative empirical study on the core elements and key internal mechanism of China's innovation-driven economic development with the provincial panel data from 1998 to 2016.The results show that venture capital,industrial diversity and local enterprise cluster all promote economic growth by promoting knowledge spillover and flow.The cultural differences of floating population lead to the barrier effect of knowledge diffusion,which has significant negative effects on economic growth.The R&D investment of enterprises to universities and research institutions cannot make up the opportunity cost of the production input due to the low patent enforcement rate,so it inhibits the economic growth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7