死亡赔偿金制度之再审视  

The Review on the Death Compensation System

作　　者：巩寿兵[1] 安调珍[1] GONG Shou-bing;AN Tiao-zhen(Humanities college,Qinghai radio and television university ,Xining 810008,China)

机构地区：[1]青海广播电视大学人文学院,青海西宁810008

出　　处：《青海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第6期43-47,共5页Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：死亡赔偿金是我国民法为了解决由于人身伤残赔偿额与死亡赔偿额之间严重不均衡而导致的"撞伤不如撞死"的现实问题而创设的一项制度,但它却并非这一问题唯一的"正解"。在刑事附带民事诉讼司法实践中,各地法院对于死亡赔偿制度的态度暧昧,做法不一。作为死亡赔偿金制度理论基础的继承丧失说存在诸多逻辑缺陷。在刑事责任和民事责任综合考量的视角下,死亡赔偿金的公平性值得商榷。死亡赔偿金制度诸多问题的根源在于立法者忽视了民法的界限这一重大理论问题。Death compensation is a system created by our tort law to solve the real problem of "crashing and killing"caused by a serious imbalance between the amount of personal injury compensation and the amount of death compensation.But it is not the only "positive solution"to solve this problem,there are still other possibilities.In the judicial practice of criminal incidental civil litigation,local courts have different attitudes toward this system and have different practices.The loss of inheritance as the theoretical basis of the death compensation system has many logical flaws.From the perspective of comprehensive consideration of criminal liability and civil liability,the fairness of death compensation is debatable.The root cause of many problems in the death compensation system is that the legislators have neglected the major theoretical issue of the boundaries of civil law.

关 键 词：死亡赔偿金 继承丧失说 公平性 民法的界限 

分 类 号：DF526[政治法律—民商法学]