作者身份与科研产出力和学术影响力的关系  

Research output and academic influence of authors with different identities

作　　者：吴凤芝[1] 张雯 杨一点 张弛[1] 张玮玮[1] 杨文君[1] 倪胜楼[1] 席宁[1] 周蕾[1] Wu Fengzhi;Zhang Wen;Yang Yidian;Zhang Chi;Zhang Weiwei;Yang Wenjun;Ni Shenglou;Xi Ning;Zhou Lei(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029;Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029 [2]北京中医药大学第三附属医院

出　　处：《现代中医临床》2018年第6期57-60,共4页Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine

摘　　要：目的分析并探讨《现代中医临床》杂志作者身份与科研产出力和学术影响力的关系。方法选取《现代中医临床》2014—2016年发表的学术论文,以作者姓名、性别、职称、学位为作者身份的指标,以论文数和基金论文数为科研产出力的指标,以论文被引次数和下载次数为学术影响力的指标,采用SPSS 20. 0统计学软件对数据进行分析,探讨作者身份与科研产出力和学术影响力的关系。结果在科研产出力和学术影响力方面,性别上的差异没有统计学意义。不同职称作者之间的论文被引次数的差异有统计学意义(P=0. 03)。两两比较发现,副高级职称与中级职称之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0. 005),其他职称之间差异没有统计学意义。不同学位作者的基金论文数和被引次数、下载次数差异均有统计学意义(P均<0. 05)。两两比较发现,博士与硕士学位论文下载次数差异有统计学意义(P=0. 01)。博士与学士学位的基金论文数、被引次数和下载次数差异均有统计学意义(P分别为0. 000,0. 002,0. 000)。硕士与学士之间差异没有统计学意义。结论不同身份作者与科研产出力和学术影响力之间有一定的关联性,对期刊编辑组稿与选择稿件有一定的指导意义。Objective To analyze and evaluate the scientific research and production processing and academic influence of different authors in Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine. Methods all articles published in Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine from 2014 to 2016,with the author’s name,gender,professional title,and academic degree as the indicators of the author’s identity,and the number of papers and fund papers as the indicators of scientific research output. Taking the number of citations and downloads of papers as the index of academic influence,the author’s scientific research output and academic influence were analyzed. The data were analyzed by SPSS 20. 0 statistical software. Results Gender difference had no statistical significance for scientific research output and academic influence.The number of citations between different titles was statistically significant(P = 0. 03). The comparison between two titles showed that the difference between the deputy senior title and the intermediate title was statistically significant(P = 0. 005), and the difference between other titles was not statistically significant. There were statistical differences in the number of author ’s fund papers,the number of citations,and the number of downloads of different degrees(P < 0. 05). The comparison between two degrees found that there was a statistical difference between doctoral and master’s degree downloads,P= 0. 01;There are statistical differences in the number of fund papers,citations,and downloads for doctoral and undergraduate degrees. P was 0. 000,0. 002,and 0. 000,respectively. There is no statistical significance between master and undergraduate,P > 0. 05. Conclusion There is a certain correlation between author identity,scientific research output and academic influence,which has certain guiding significance for periodical editors in the composition and selection of manuscripts.

关 键 词：作者 身份 科研产出力 学术影响力 现代中医临床 

分 类 号：G236[文化科学]