检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张梦[1] 孙曙日[1] 张宏欣 ZHANG Meng;SUN Shuri;ZHANG Hongxin(Section No.43in Unit No.91439of PLA,Dalian 116041,China)
出 处:《数字海洋与水下攻防》2018年第4期81-84,89,共5页Digital Ocean & Underwater Warfare
摘 要:针对水下武器装备抗爆试验中等效药包试验缺乏明确实施规范和标准的问题,从常用的经验公式出发,通过分析计算和实例,对冲击波超压等效和冲击因子等效方法进行了比对。其中冲击因子等效方法考虑到了药包质量、爆距、爆炸与目标相对位置和姿态等因素,以等效试验结论的合理性和贴近实际程度为依据,以实际试验为例对等效试验实施进行了分析,建议等效试验爆源药量选择15~20 kgTNT当量为宜。Aiming at the problems of equivalent charge test lacking definite specification and standard in anti-explosion test of underwater weaponry,based on common empirical formula,in this paper the shock overpressure equivalent method and shock factor equivalent method are compared by analytical calculation and instances. For the shock factor equivalent method,the factors such as the mass of charge,the collapse distance,and the relative position and attitude between explosion and target are considered. On the basis of the rationality of equivalent test conclusion and the degree of closing to reality,taking actual test for example,this paper analyzes implementation of equivalent test,and proposes selecting 15 - 20 kg equivalent weight for charge mass of explosion source in equivalent test.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33