对《监察法》中律师介入缺失问题的思考  

Reflections on the Lack of Intervention of Lawyers in the Supervision Law

作　　者：龚珊珊 蒋铁初 GONG Shan-shan;JIANG Tie-chu(Hangzhou Normal university,Hangzhou 311121,china)

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学,浙江杭州311121

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2018年第5期53-59,共7页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

基　　金：2018年国家社科基金"中国仁证司法的传统及其权益转化的研究"(18BFX025)

摘　　要：作为反腐败国家立法制度的改革,《监察法》自试点、草案审议到公布,就存在被监察对象的辩护权保障缺失、律师介入缺位的问题。而律师介入问题,不仅涉及对监察对象的辩护权保障,更关系到在监察工作中对监察机关权力运用情况的监督。本文将围绕监委会办理的因涉嫌职务犯罪而需将调查结果移送至人民检察院处理的案件进行讨论,从我国律师介入的立法意义出发,对《监察法》中的律师介入缺失问题进行思考并提出引入建议以完善监察法权利保障体系。As a reform of the anti-corruption national legislative system,the"Publication Law"has been lacking in the lack of defense rights from the pilot,draft and publication.The lawyer’s involvement in the issue involves not only the protection of the right to defend the object of supervision,but also the supervision of the use of the power of the supervisory authority in the supervision work.This article will focus on the cases handled by the JISC that need to transfer the investigation results to the People’s Procuratorate for suspected duty crimes.From the legislative significance of the intervention of Chinese lawyers,we will consider the lack of lawyers involved in the Supervision Law.Introduce suggestions to improve the supervision system rights protection system.

关 键 词：监察制度 辩护权 律师介入 

分 类 号：D922.114[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]