“塔克-伍德”命题的马克思解答  

Marx's solution to Tucker-Wood's proposition

作　　者：白刚[1] 曾俊 Bai Gang;Zeng Jun

机构地区：[1]吉林大学哲学基础理论研究中心,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《东岳论丛》2019年第2期147-153,192,共8页DongYue Tribune

基　　金：教育部人文社科基地重大项目"当代哲学发展趋向与人类文明形态的哲学自觉"(17JJD720003);国家社科基金一般项目"资本与自由:马克思政治哲学研究"(14BZX021)

摘　　要：学界关于马克思主义所激烈争论的"马克思与正义"问题,反映了存在于伦理学研究中关于"自由"与"因果"之间"对立"的困境。自休谟、康德以来的相关理论探索,要么将二者进行彻底的"二分",要么主张用"因果律"取代"自由律",亦或是"自由律"取代"因果律"。历史唯物主义从"历史性"和"现实性"的基本立场出发,在"现实的个人"实践活动中超越了传统伦理学"自由"与"因果"相互对立的概念框架,从而实现了"自由"与"因果"的"和解",并进而展现出马克思历史唯物主义的内在张力。The "Tucker-Wood"proposition of "Marx and Justice"fiercely debated by analytical Marxism reflects the dilemma of the "opposition"between "liberty"and "causality"in ethical research.The related research since Hume and Kant has either "dichotomized"the two or advocated the replacement of law of causality and the Law of liberty.Starting from the basic standpoint of "historicity"and "reality",historic^materialism surpasses the conceptual framework,of the opposition between "freedom"and "causality"in traditional ethics in the reconciliation between "freedom"and "causality",and practice of "realistic individual" ,thus realizing the " reconciliation" between "freedom"and "causality",and then demonstrating the internal tension of Marx's historical materialism.

关 键 词：自由 因果 历史唯物主义 “塔克-伍德”命题 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]