历史编纂学史与史学史学科关系辨析  

The Relationship between Historiography and the History of Historical Studies

作　　者：陈其泰[1] Chen Qitai

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第1期28-34,共7页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(09AZS001)

摘　　要：与西方史学相比,历史编纂是中国史学最为优长和最具特色之所在。当前,为了构建中国特色的学科体系和提升国际学术话语权的需要,一项迫切任务是努力撰成系统的《中国历史编纂学史》。对于历史编纂学史与史学史之间的关系要从三个方面进行辨析:一、历史编纂学史是史学史的分支学科;二、历史编纂学史必须明确自己的研究重点;三、二者研究的内容应当各有侧重。In contrast with the historical studies in the west, historiography is the longest and most distinguished features of the historical studies in China. At present, it is imminent to accomplish the compilation of a systematic book The History of Chinese Historiography to construct a discipline system with Chinese characteristics and to strengthen the power of academic discourse in the world. Thus the relationship between the history of historiography and the history of historical studies should be studied. This paper argues that the history of historiography is a subfield in the history of historical studies, the history of historiography must define its research focus, and both the history of historiography and the history of historical studies should have their own concentration.

关 键 词：历史编纂学史 史学史 构建学科体系 学术话语权 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]