香港现行法律对煽动性言论的规制  

The Regulation of Seditious Speech by Existing Laws of Hong Kong SAR

作　　者：吴昱江 WU Yujiang(Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学研究生工作部,北京100084

出　　处：《法学论坛》2019年第1期104-113,共10页Legal Forum

摘　　要：在不通过我国《香港特别行政区基本法》第23条立法,也不通过该《基本法》附件三实施全国性的、与国家安全和公共秩序相关法律的前提下,香港特别行政区目前已经拥有一系列法律,可以对危害社会秩序的煽动性言论作出规制与惩罚。首先,从特别行政区终审法院在2018年审理的律政司司长诉黄之锋及另二人案中表明,香港特别行政区《公安条例》第18条被法院确认可以有效惩罚公共集会中的煽动性言论。其次,在2013年终审法院裁决的陈宥羲诉香港特别行政区案中,终审法院也裁定,在满足特定条件后,普通法上的"作出有违公德行为"罪行可以规制互联网上的煽动性言论。总体来说,在特区律政司的积极配合下,香港现行法律可以比较好地规制特区出现的极端煽动性言论。If we assume that the provisions of Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 will not be materialized in the near future,and further assume that no national laws regarding national security and social order will be added to Appendix III of the Hong Kong Basic Law,does the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region have what it takes to effectively regulate Seditious Speech by relying only on the existing laws of Hong Kong SAR? The Hong Kong SAR already has relevant existing laws to effectively regulate Seditious Speech.From the recent decisions delivered by the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal,we know that Article 18 of the Hong Kong Public Order Ordinance can effectively regulate and punish Seditious Speech in public gatherings;Secondly,the common law offence of Outraging Public Decency has a great potential to regulate Seditious Speech on the internet.With the co-operation of the Justice Department of Hong Kong SAR,The existing Laws of Hong Kong SAR do an adequate job in regulating seditious speech in public and on the internet.

关 键 词：香港特别行政区 煽动性言论 《公安条例》 “作出有违公德行为”罪行 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]