检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丛明舒[1] CONG Mingshu(Guanghua School of Management,Peking University)
出 处:《金融研究》2018年第12期189-206,共18页Journal of Financial Research
摘 要:本文对比了美国和中国关于期权隐含方差的两个典型理论规律所表现出的实证差异。首先,期权隐含方差作为公认的风险度量指标,应该与未来期间的股权溢价成正相关关系,在这一点上中美实证结果完全相反;其次,现代期权定价理论预测期权隐含方差应该高于标的资产实现方差,而中国市场期权隐含方差和实现方差的比值要显著低于美国。As the starting point of studying China’s option market,this paper compares two empirical differ-ences about option-implied variances between China and US. The risk-return trade-off requires a positiverelationship between option-implied variances and future equity premiums. Such a relation is validated in theUS market but is violated in China. Also,modern option pricing theories predict higher option-implied vari-ances than realized variances. Such an effect is weaker in China than in US. These two findings suggest somedirections for future research on China’s option market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38