检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘景景 Liu Jing-jing
机构地区:[1]农业农村部农村经济研究中心,北京100810;[2]农业农村部农村经济研究中心产业与技术研究室,北京100810
出 处:《亚太经济》2018年第6期70-77,M0005,M0006,共10页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基 金:国家现代农业产业技术体系项目(CARS-46-25);农业农村部渔业局和市场司项目资助.
摘 要:美国农业补贴政策从最初出台到历次演变,都是围绕着稳定和提高农民收入这一根本目标。美国的农民收入干预政策是将资源由消费者、纳税人手中转移至农业生产者,是对收入的二次分配。透过补贴政策的演进,可以分析美国农民收入政策的总体思路和背后逻辑,即对收入问题的长期性做好准备、畅通农民利益表达渠道,以及减少市场干预。The United States agricultural subsidy policy has focused on the fundamental goal of stabilizing and increasing farmers’ income. The intervention policy of farmers’ income in the United States is to transfer resources from consumers and taxpayers to agricultural producers. This is actually a secondary distribution of income. Through the evolution of the subsidy policy,we can analyze the overall thinking and the logic behind the American farmer income policy. The evolution of American agricultural policy and farmers ’income have taught us that China needs to recognise the long-term nature of its income problem,smooth farmers’ interest expression channels,and reduce market intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222