刑法教义学的新面相  

New Face of Criminal Law Doctrine

作　　者：马荣春[1] 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学法学院

出　　处：《东方法学》2019年第1期43-57,共15页Oriental Law

摘　　要：刑法教义学应在研究对象与研究方法的紧密结合中予以定义,并显示出刑法教义学与刑法注释学的区别所在。刑法教义学的学科地位应从法教义学在法学中的地位予以把握,并可将其描述为"刑法学主流的主流"或"刑法学正宗的正宗"或"刑法学中枢的中枢"。证立性应被视为刑法教义学的根本属性,且其以批评性为重要派生,而决定刑法教义学的证立性及其批判性是社会生活的正当诉求,其将赋予刑法规范命题以社会普遍可接受性,从而具有增进刑法司法公信力的实践意义。实践性等构成刑法教义学的具体特征,而规范命题的妥当性和刑法司法公信力的增进性,分别构成刑法教义学的理论目标和实践目标。在作出观念更新之后,刑法教义学才能够成为一门"活学"。Criminal law doctrine ought to be defined in the tight binding of researching object and researching method, and display the differences between the annotation of criminal law and the doctrine of criminal law. The position of criminal law doctrine ought to be grasped through the view point of law doctrine in legal science. Justification ought to be regarded as the primary attribute of criminal law doctrine, from which the criticism of criminal law doctrine derives. What decides the justifiability and criticism of criminal law doctrine is legitimate demand of social life, which gives criminal law universal acceptability of society as to strengthen the judicial credibility of criminal law. Practicality constitutes the specific characteristics of the doctrine of criminal law, while the appropriateness of the normative proposition and the enhancement of the judicial credibility of criminal law constitute the theoretical and practical objectives of the doctrine of criminal law respectively. Only when the renewal of concept has been made, criminal law doctrine can be a live science.

关 键 词：刑法教义学 规范刑法学 证立性 规范功能 

分 类 号：DF6[政治法律—刑法学]