民国时期口述史探研  

An Exploration of the Oral Account History in the Period of the Republic of China

作　　者：周俊超[1] ZHOU Jun -chao(School of History,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200241)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史系,上海200241

出　　处：《郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第6期125-129,157,共6页Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：民国时期口述史是传统口述史向现代口述史学嬗变的过渡形态。在民国时期,"口述"概念已获得较充分的理解和使用。从重视口头性到叙事性、纪实性,民国时期"口述"被广泛应用到考试、翻译、文学、新闻、考古等诸多领域,最终形成口述史。在选题、采访、叙事等方面,民国时期口述史较之今日体现出诸多亮点,如选题上,重视公众参与性与题材广泛性,体现"民史""总体史"色彩;采访工具上,已有条件使用现代化录音设备;叙事上,由于事件发生时间较近,故细节性强、史料价值高。民国时期口述史也存在采访信息与过程透明度不足、采访活动与内容的可验证性较弱等缺陷,这些都为当下的口述史研究提供了启示。The history of oral account in the period of the Republic of China was a transition form from traditional history of oral account to modern one.In that period,the concept of oral account had won relatively full understanding and utilization.In aspects of topic selection,interview and narration,the history of oral account in that period showed more highlights than that of today:In terms of selecting topics,it attached more importance to public participation and wide-ranging themes,and embodied characteristics of civil and overall history;as for tools for interview,it was facilitated with modern recording equipment;with regard to narration,it showed more details and higher value of historical materials owing to the recency of occurrences.However,the history of oral account in the period of the Republic of China also had such drawbacks as insufficient transparency of interview information and process and feeble verifiability of interview activities and contents,which produced implications for present studies of oral account history.

关 键 词：口述史学 公众史学 民国报刊 采访编辑 

分 类 号：K03[历史地理—历史学]