检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯巍[1] HOU Wei(School of Law,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出 处:《贵州警官职业学院学报》2018年第6期53-60,69,共9页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
基 金:广东省哲学社会科学"十三五"规划项目(GD16XFX06)
摘 要:独立性是律师职业的根本属性,也是确保律师尊严,实现律师职业公益职能的根本保证。律师接受委托人委托,自应遵照其指示行事,实现委托人利益最大化,然而当委托人利益与社会公益发生冲突时,律师应如何秉持其独立性,殊值探讨。以律师独立于委托人为视角,通过比较法考察,从律师契约的定性、结果报酬的法律限制、接受委托之禁止、律师缄默义务的豁免、律师契约终止权与违反独立性的惩戒等方面分析考察律师独立性的具体保障措施,能有助于我国相关立法的完善。Independence is the fundamental attribute of the lawyers’ profession, as well as the fundamental guarantee for ensuring lawyers’ dignity and realizing their function of public services. Entrusted by the clients, lawyers are obliged to obey their instructions for maximizing their interests. However, when the clients’ interests conflict with the public interests, how the lawyers should independently practice is worth exploring. Viewing from lawyers’ right to be independent from their clients and comparatively studying the laws, this article aims to work out concrete measures for guaranteeing lawyers’ independence. This paper analyses the issues such as the nature of lawyers’ contract, legal restrictions on result-based payment, lawyers’ right to refuse to defend the clients, the exemption of lawyers’ silent obligation, lawyers’ right to terminate the contract and the disciplinary measures for lawyer’s violation of independence, aiming to improve China’s relevant legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30