中越桩基检测规范抗压静载试验差异探讨  

Comparative study on static pile load test between Chinese and Vietnam code

作　　者：朱建民 鲁少毅 裴进玉 谢礼飞 Zhu Jianmin;Lu Shaoyi;Bui Tienngoc;Xie Lifei(Nanfing Dongda Self-balanced Pile Test Co.,Ltd.,Nanfing 210018,China;The Second Construction Co.,Ltd.of China Construction Third Engineering Bureau,Wuhan 430070,China)

机构地区：[1]南京东大自平衡桩基检测有限公司,南京210018 [2]中建三局第二建设工程有限责任公司,武汉430070

出　　处：《工程勘察》2019年第1期30-34,共5页Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying

摘　　要：对于抗压桩的静载试验,越南规范《Piles-standard test method in situ for piles under axial compressive load》(TCVN 9393:2012)与中国规范《建筑基桩检测技术规范》(JGJ106-2014)存在一定的差异。本文对试桩数量、加载量、试验桩、试桩—反力系统—位移测量系统的布置距离、越南标准加载法与我国慢速维持荷载法、终止加载条件、极限承载力判定方法和安全系数取值等重点内容进行了比较,并就二者显著差异之处进行了讨论。There are some differences between Vietnam code Piles-standard test method in situ for piles under axial compressive load(TCVN 9393:2012) and Chinese code Technical code for testing of building foundation piles(JGJ106-2014) on the static load test method of piles under compressive load. The main contents of the two codes are compared including the requirement on test pile quantity, test load, trial pile, the distance between testing pile, reaction system and measurement system, the test procedure, the test termination criteria, the ultimate bearing capacity determination, the safety factor etc. The main differences between the two codes are discussed.

关 键 词：抗压桩 静载试验 中国规范 越南规范 

分 类 号：TU473.1[建筑科学—结构工程]