锁定钢板与常规手术治疗肱骨近端骨折疗效比较  

A Comparative Study of Locking Plate and Routine Operation in the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures

作　　者：贾瑞平[1] JIA Rui-ping(Xinxiang Center Hospital,Henan Xinxiang 453000)

机构地区：[1]新乡市中心医院,河南新乡453000

出　　处：《深圳中西医结合杂志》2018年第24期110-112,共3页Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

摘　　要：目的:探究锁定钢板与常规手术治疗肱骨近端骨折疗效比较。方法:选取2012年3月至2017年3月新乡市中心医院收治的肱骨近端骨折的患者110例作为研究对象,分为对照组和观察组,每组55例。对照组给予常规的手术治疗,观察组患者给予锁定钢板治疗,术后观察并比较两组患者手术效果及预后。结果:观察组患者术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分等一般情况均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组患者的治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论:锁定钢板与常规手术治疗肱骨近端骨折疗效比较具有优势,能够明显改善患者术后的生活质量,有利于患者恢复健康,值得临床上应用。Objective To compare the curative effect of locking plate and routine operation in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture. Methods 110 patients with proximal humeral fractures admitted to our hospital from March 2012 to March 2017 were selected as the study subjects, and divided into control group and observation group, 55 cases in each group. The control group was given routine surgical treatment, while the observation group was given locking plate treatment. After operation, the effect and prognosis of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The blood volume, operation time, hospitalization time and VAS score of the patients in the observation group were better than those in the control group, with statistical signifi cance(P < 0.05);the total effective rate of the patients in the observation group was signifi cantly higher than that in the control group, and the incidence of complications was signifi cantly lower than that in the control group, with statistical signifi cance(P < 0.05).Conclusion Locking plate is superior to conventional operation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture. It can signifi cantly improve the quality of life of patients after operation, and is conducive to the recovery of patients. It is worthy of wide clinical promotion.

关 键 词：肱骨近端骨折 钢板固定手术 常规手术 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]