检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜健荣[1] DU Jian-rong(Yunnan University,Law School,Kunming,Yunnan 650500,China)
出 处:《贵州民族研究》2018年第11期33-37,共5页Guizhou Ethnic Studies
基 金:云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目"民族地区调解联动机制构建问题研究"(项目编号:2014Y046)的阶段性成果
摘 要:少数民族习惯法在民族地区的社会控制与纠纷解决中具有重要意义,但是由于面临法律依据不足、法官认同有限、当事人主张能力欠缺以及内容难以查证等问题而难以为司法审判所正式吸收。对于这些障碍,可以参考我国台湾地区原住民族习惯法司法适用的相关经验,从制定专门的法律依据、对法官进行有针对性的民族文化培训、为少数民族当事人提供法律援助以及建立多元化习惯法查明机制等方面着手加以克服。Minority customary laws are of vital importance for social control and dispute resolution in the minority areas. However, it is hard for the customary laws to be formally recognized in judicial trials due to such problems as their lack of legal basis, limited acknowledgement of them by judges, litigants’ lack of claiming ability, and existence of the difficulty in checking and verifying their contents. These obstacles can be overcome by referring to relevant experience of Taiwan Region from the perspectives of creating special legal basis, providing judges with training of minority cultures, providing legal assistance to minority litigants, and creating multiple mechanisms for identifying minority customary laws.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28