基于过程性评价的高等数学考核方式的改革与研究  被引量:20

Reform and research of higher mathematics examination method based on process evaluation

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:郭萍[1] GUO Ping(Qindao College,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266106,China)

机构地区:[1]青岛理工大学琴岛学院,山东青岛266106

出  处:《青海师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2018年第4期77-81,共5页Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Natural Science Edition)

基  金:青岛理工大学琴岛学院项目"基于移动互联网环境的高等数学教学模式创新研究"(2017008B)

摘  要:针对传统终结性考核方式的"一刀切",文中给出了过程性考核与终结性考核相结合的考核体系.在过程性考核中提出了小组制,随堂小组测试(quiz)以及小组成绩竞分积分制的方法,制定了详细的过程性考核打分细则.同时,终结性考核由传统的闭卷考试改为"半开卷"的考核方式.通过考核方式的改革,达到小组成员之间互相学习,数学基础较弱的学生因为集体责任感,积极学习高等数学的效果.同时,小组成绩竞分积分制的实施,使得组与组成员之间你争我赶,形成了良好的学习氛围.In view of the"one size fits all"of the traditional summative assessment method,the assessment system combining process examination with summative assessment is given.In the process assessment,agroup system is put forward,with the group test(quiz)and the method of team score scoring system,detailed detailed rules for the process assessment are formulated.At the same time,summative assessment is changed from traditional closed book examination to "half open book"examination method.Through the reform of the assessment methods,the students learn from each other and the students with a weak foundation of mathematics learn the effect of higher mathematics because of the sense of collective responsibility.At the same time,the implementation of the group scoring system has made a good learning atmosphere between you and the members of the group.

关 键 词:过程性评价 小组制 竞分积分制 “半开卷”考核 

分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象