检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王玲[1] 徐静[1] 刘君颖 李岩[1] 刘川 吴慧群[2] Wang Ling;Xu Jing;Liu Junying;Li Yan;Liu Chuan;Wu Huiqun(Department of Reproduction Center,Shanghai Tenth People's of Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200072,China;Department of Hematology,Shanghai Tenth People's of Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University,Shanghai 200072,China)
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属上海第十人民医院生殖中心,200072 [2]同济大学附属上海第十人民医院血液科,200072
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2019年第7期544-548,共5页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的构建辅助生育治疗护理质量评价指标体系,为科学地评价生殖中心护理质量提供依据。 方法基于结构-过程-结果(SPO)质量模型为理论基础,应用文献查询、现场流程追踪、德尔菲专家函询和层次分析法,构建生殖中心辅助生育治疗护理质量评价指标体系。 结果专家函询两轮问卷有效回收率(RR)均为100%;专家权威系数Cr值分别为0.813、0.845;协调系数W值分别为0.331、0.372,均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。最终形成了三大维度、14个二级指标、47个条目的辅助生育治疗护理质量评价指标体系;运用Yaaph软件确定了一级和二级指标权重,并通过一致性检验(Cr<0.1),三级条目的变异系数均<0.20。 结论生殖中心辅助生育治疗护理质量指标体系权重分配合理,指标明确,具有系统性和客观性,值得临床推广。Objective The evaluation index system of quality of assisted fertility treatment care was constructed to provide the basis for scientific evaluation of quality of care in reproductive center.MethodsBased on the structure-process-outcome (SPO) quality model, evaluation index system for fertility treatment care in the reproductive center was constructed by literature query, field process tracking, Delphi expert consultation and analytic hierarchy process (AHP).Results The effective recovery rate (RR) of the two rounds of the questionnaire was 100%. The expert authority coefficient Cr values were 0.813, 0.845 respectively. The W value of the coordination coefficient was 0.331, 0.372, both of which were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Finally, an evaluation index system of quality of assisted fertility treatment care with three dimensions, 14 secondary indicators and 47 items was formed. Yaaph software was used to determine the weight coefficients of primary and secondary indicators, and the consistency test (Cr<0.1) was performed, and the variation coefficients of all tertiary items were <0.20.Conclusions The weight of the quality index system of assisted reproductive treatment care in reproductive center is reasonable, the indicators were clear, systematic and objective, and worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38