检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学电子工程系
出 处:《测井技术》2002年第2期113-117,共5页Well Logging Technology
摘 要:在随钻电阻率测井中 ,基于相位的电阻率测量曲线和基于衰减的电阻率曲线在地层中经常出现彼此分离的现象 ,对电磁波电阻率测井的探测深度进行了详细的研究 ,研究表明这种分离与电阻率换算方法有关。同时指出基于IRPGF定义的探测深度有一定的局限性 ,只能用于定性分析。而且 ,IRPGF探测深度越大并不说明其测量结果越接近地层真电阻率。最后对导致电阻率曲线分离的因素进行了归纳 。In LWD resistivity logging, the amplitude based log and the phase based log are often separated in formation. In this paper, the investigation depth of LWD propagation resistivity tool is studied in detail, the results of which show that the separation is related to the method used to convert phase and amplitude data into risistivity. The paper also indicates that the depth of investigation based on IRPGF (integrated radial pseudo geometrical factor) is at most a qualitative statement, and in such sense, that deeper IRPGF investigation depth does not mean its measurement is always closer to the uninvaded formation resistivity. At the end, the elements effecting the investigation depth are sumed up, and the more reliable method for evaluating the invaded formation with the LWD resistivity tool is put forward.
关 键 词:随钻电磁波传播电阻率 测量工具 电磁波传播测井 电阻率 探测深度 随钻测井 侵入带
分 类 号:P631.83[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249