检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩东方[1] 赵宝珊[1] 钟建平[1] 孙小军[1] 王建华[1] 裘雨林[2]
机构地区:[1]浙江省绍兴市第六人民医院肺内科,312000 [2]浙江省绍兴市人民医院,312000
出 处:《浙江临床医学》2002年第4期266-267,共2页Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
摘 要:目的 评价多功能气胸诊疗仪治疗自发性气胸的临床应用价值。方法 将自发性气胸患者80例随机分成二组 ,以多功能气胸诊疗仪为主的治疗组 (新疗法 )与水封瓶闭式引流治疗气胸的对照组 (传统方法 )进行对比研究。结果 多功能气胸诊疗仪治疗自发性气胸比水封瓶闭式引流治疗气胸具有操作简便、安全 ,能明显缩短气胸治愈时间 ,节省住院费用 ,提高气胸治愈率。结论Objective To study the clinical application value of multifunctional equipment for diagnosis and therapy of spontaneous pneumothorax. Methods 80 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax were randomly divided into two groups. 40 cases were treated by multifunctional equipment(new method), another 40 cases were treated by closed thoracic drainage (general method).Analysis was made on the two groups. Results Multifunctional equipment for diagnosis and therapy of spontaneous pneumothorax were simple and safe, new method could shorten the hospitalization time with less fees for the treatment, increased the cure rate of the patients. Conclusion The study suggests that the new method are better than the general method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222