中央区及其附近病灶的神经导航手术与传统开颅手术的对比研究  

A comparable research of neuro-navigation and conventional operation around central region

作　　者：钱若兵[1] 魏建军[1] 汪业汉[1] 傅先明[1] 魏祥品[1] 姜晓峰[1] 李光群[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽省立医院神经外科,合肥230001

出　　处：《中国微侵袭神经外科杂志》2002年第1期13-15,共3页Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

摘　　要：目的比较神经导航与传统开颅两种手术方法对切除中央区及其附近的病灶的临床疗效。方法30例中央区及其附近病灶的病人随机分成两组,分别接受神经外科导航手术和传统开颅手术,比较病灶的位置、大小、骨瓣大小、手术前后神经系统损害程度。结果神经导航手术组骨瓣面积为(28.62±11.83)cm2,传统开颅手术组骨瓣面积为(39.32±13.07)cm2,两者差异显著(P=0.04);术后神经系统并发症神经导航组为2/15,传统组为10/15,差异极其显著(P=0.008)。结论神经导航手术组与传统手术组相比具有定位准确、侵袭性小、并发症少等优点。Objective To compare the curative effect of neuro-navigation and conventional operation on resecting the lesion around central region.Method30cases were devided into two group s randomly.The localization,volume,area of craniotomy and complication were compared in neuro-navigation and conventional operation group.Result The area of craniotomy was(28.62±11.83)cm 2 in neuro-navigation group,and was(39.32±13.07)cm 2 in conventional operation group,there was a significant difference(P=0.04).The complication of neuro-navigationgroup was2/15,and was10/15in conventional operation group,there was a significant difference(P=0.008).Conclusion The advantage of neuro-navigation includes precise localization,minimal in-vasion and few complication compared with conventional operation.

关 键 词：临床疗效 传统开颅手术 神经导航 微侵袭 中央区病灶 对比分析 中央区附近病灶 

分 类 号：R651.1[医药卫生—外科学]