检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄承标[1] 黄炳京[1] 李海全[1] 莫柳艳[1]
出 处:《河北林果研究》2002年第1期21-24,共4页Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research
摘 要:对芒果园及其灌草植被荒坡的土壤水文物理性质进行了对比测定。结果表明 :1~ 4 0cm深度的土壤及容重 ,芒果园为 1 34~ 1 4 5g/cm3,相应比灌草植被荒坡 (1 4 6~ 1 5 0g/cm3)低 0 0 5~ 0 12g/cm3;而在 4 0~ 10 0cm深度 ,两者的土壤容重则基本等值 (1 6 2g/cm3)。 0~10 0cm深度的土壤总孔隙度、通气度、最大持水量和渗透速度的平均值 ,芒果园依次为5 0 15 %、 2 3 2 0 %、 34 2 8和 1 77mm/min ,分别比灌草植被荒坡高 3 4 7%、 5 2 2 %、 2 15 %和0 75mm/min。说明灌草植被荒坡变为芒果园后对改良土壤结构。In this paper, comparative studies were conducted on soil hydrology physical properties of mango fruit garden and sbrub-grass vegetation. The result showed that the soil volume weight (0~40 cm) of mango fruit garden was 1 34~1 45 g/cm 3, 0 05~0 12 g/cm 3 lower than that of shrub-grass vegetation(1 46~1 50 g/cm 3) repecstively. But the soil volume weight (40~100 cm) were basic eguate(1 62 g/cm 3) of the two. Mean total capillary porosity, men aeration porosity, mean maximum moisture capaity and mean in filtration rate were 50 15%, 23 20%, 34 28%and 1 77 mm/min in proper order, thus 3 47%, 5 22%, 2 15% and 0 75 mm/min higher than that of shrub-grass vegetation change then into mango fruit garden later,had better effects in improve the soil ameli-oration, raise water storage and inerease soil structure permeate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28