检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第一军医大学第一附属医院肾移植科,广州510515
出 处:《护理学杂志(综合版)》2002年第5期387-389,共3页Journal of Nursing Science
摘 要:目的了解家庭护理干预对社区肾移植病人生活质量的影响。方法将 2 0 0例出院后肾移植病人随机分为两组 ,干预组 (10 0例 )进行生理、心理、社会行为等护理干预 ,对照组 (10 0例 )未实施干预。运用日常生活能力量表(ADL)、社会功能评定量表 (SDSS)、抑郁自评量表 (SDS)及护理依赖性评估对干预前后的效果进行分析、比较 ;同时比较两组并发症发生情况。结果干预组病人的心理功能、社会功能及日常生活能力较干预前显著改善 ,差异有极显著性意义 (均 P<0 .0 1) ;两组并发症发生率比较 ,差异有极显著性意义 (P<0 .0 1)。结论家庭护理干预可提高肾移植病人的生活质量 ,减少术后并发症的发生率。Objective To know the effect of family nursing interference on living quality of the patients undergoing renal transplantation. Methods 200 renal transplant recipients after discharged from hospital were divided into 2 groups: interference group ( n =100) and control group ( n =100). The patients in the interference group were given family nursing interference on physiology, psychology and their social behavior. By using ADL, SDSS, SDS and nursing dependent assessment, the effects before and after the interference were analyzed and compared. Results Family nursing interferences could effectively improve the psychological capabilities, social capabilities and daily life abilities of the renal transplant recipients with the difference being very significant (all P < 0 01). There was very significant difference in the morbidity of complications between the two groups ( P <0 01). Conclusion Family nursing interference could effectively improve the living quality of the patients after kidney transplantation, reduce the occurrence of the complications following renal transplantation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145