检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁忠伟[1] 刘伟[1] 张恭孝[2] 马润宇[1]
机构地区:[1]北京化工大学化学工程学院,北京100029 [2]泰山医学院工程学院,泰安271000
出 处:《现代化工》2002年第4期26-29,共4页Modern Chemical Industry
基 金:中澳机构合作项目 (ACILP)
摘 要:采用模拟计算和实验的方法对直接接触式膜蒸馏 (DCMD)和气隙式膜蒸馏 (AGMD)过程进行了比较研究。模拟计算及实验结果表明 ,AGMD中的气隙构成了过程的主要阻力 ,使得跨膜温差远小于膜两侧流体主体温差 ,这是两种膜蒸馏方式行为差别的主要原因所在。与AGMD相比 ,DCMD不仅膜通量水平高 ,而且膜通量对操作条件反应灵敏 ,易于实施过程的强化。而DCMD的热效率与AGMD相比差距并不太大。The difference between direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) and air gap membrane distillation (AGMD) is compared,both by the prediction of the mathematical models of these two processes and by membrane distillation experiments.Results indicate that the limit step in AGMD process is the transport in air gap,and this makes the temperature difference between two sides of the membrane much lower than that of two fluids on the two side of the membrane.Compared with AGMD,DCMD process exhibits higher level of water flux,and its water flux is much more sensitive to operating conditions,and this makes it easier to optimize the process.And DCMD can acquire an acceptable thermal efficiency,although its value is some lower than that of AGMD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222