检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学制冷与低温工程研究所,上海200030
出 处:《上海环境科学》2002年第2期67-70,共4页Shanghai Environmental Sciences
摘 要:综合案例研究结果,结合氢气、甲醇在不同储运方式时的成本,从固定设施成本、尾气排放、燃料价格、汽车造价4个方面比较了氢气、甲醇、汽油3种燃料电池汽车的经济性。结果表明:(1)直接氢燃料电池是燃料电池汽车的首选动力;(2)天然气重整制氢是目前氢燃料电池汽车获得燃料优先考虑的方式;(3)高压氢气、液氢是当前燃料电池汽车的首选燃料。The results of the typical case study presented in literatures and analysed to ascertain the determining factors of economic benefit of fuel cell vehicles. The production cost of hydrogen and methane at different storage and transportation schemes have been first evaluated, then the economic benefit of fuel cell vehicles fueled by hydrogen, methanol and gasoline were evaluated in such aspects as stationary infrastructure cost, emission, fuel retailed price and manufacturing cost of vehicles. The cost-benefit analysis of hydrogen production from methane reforming at different capacities was carried out, and high-pressure gaseous hydrogen, liquefied hydrogen were emphasized for the current on-broad hydrogen storage.
关 键 词:燃料储运方案 经济性分析 燃料电池 汽车 环境经济 氢 甲醇 汽油
分 类 号:U469.722[机械工程—车辆工程] X382.1[交通运输工程—载运工具运用工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15