双腔袋(PN-Twin)配制营养液与洁净台内人工配制营养液、电脑配制营养液效率的对比研究  

A Comparative Study for PN-Twin vs Conventional Mixing and Computerized Mixing Methods

作　　者：蒋朱明[1] 王秀荣[1] 曹金铎[2] 朱明炜[2] 孙文彦[1] 刘欣莲[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学北京协和医院外科,北京100730 [2]卫生部北京医院

出　　处：《中国临床营养杂志》2002年第2期83-85,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition

摘　　要：目的双腔袋(PN-Twin)配制营养液与洁净台人工、电脑配制营养液效率的对比研究。方法通过用双腔袋(PN-Twin)和在洁净台配制54次营养液对照考察两种方法的简便性和经济性。数据统计采用Statview软件(SASCo.USAoriginalproduct),属正态数据,用方差分析。结果本研究数据为配液总时间(包括准备时间、混合时间和废物处理时间)。其中,双腔袋(PN-Twin)配制为(25±8)秒;洁净台配制为12分37秒±2分52秒;电脑配制为13分34秒±1分56秒。结果显示双腔袋(PN-Twin)与洁净台配液总时间之间差异有显著性(P=0.0001);双腔袋(PN-Twin)与电脑配制总时间之间差异也有显著性(P=0.0001)。结论双腔袋配液可不在洁净台上操作,且无污染、操作方便、配液时间短,临床实用。Objective To compare the mixing time of PN-Twin (Ajinomoto Pharma,Tokyo,Japan)vs conventional method&computerized method.Methods Record the total operating time for different methods of mixing.Total:54bags.Data was analyzed by ANOVA using statistic software Statview(SAS Co.original product of USA).Significant level was at P<0.05.Result Total operation time (including preparing time,mixing time and abandoning time)for PN-Twin was:25″±8″,the conventional way was:12' 37″±2' 52″,the computerized automatic mixer was:13' 34″±1' 56″.It indicated that there existed significant difference between the PN-Twin and conventional method(P=0.001),also between the PN-Twin and the automatic mixer(P=0.001).Conclusions PN-Twin could be mixed even if no clean room/air-flow hood condition.The operation process was simple and the operation time was significant shorter than the conventional method and computerized mixer.

关 键 词：双腔袋 洁净台 人工配制 营养液 电脑配制 配制效率 

分 类 号：R459.3[医药卫生—治疗学]