四川省疟疾不同时期防治策略的效果分析  

Analysis on Malaria Control Effectiveness under Different Control Measures in Sichuan Province

作　　者：刘群华[1] 曹昌志[1] 李彦[1] 康万民[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川省寄生虫病防治研究所,四川成都610041

出　　处：《实用寄生虫病杂志》2002年第2期49-52,共4页Journal of Practical Parasitic Diseases

摘　　要：目的评估四川省不同抗疟措施的防治效果。方法按发病率 >1 0 /万为流行 ,>1 /万～≤ 1 0 /万为控制流行 ,≤ 1 /万为基本消灭 ,作为疟疾流行程度划分标准。评估“两根治一预防”、“两根治 +灭蚊”和“水旱轮作”3种抗疟措施的效果。结果两根治—预防的抗疟措施 ,消灭了恶性疟和三日疟 ,控制了疟疾暴发流行 ,降低了发病率。两根治 +灭蚊措施 ,控制了疟疾流行 ,降低了危害。水旱轮作措施从根本上改变了疟疾流行条件 ,疟疾发病率连续 8年下降并巩固在 1 /万以下。结论水旱轮作是推进疟疾防治可持续发展的战略措施。Objective To evaluate malaria control effectiveness under 3 different kinds of control measures, i.e. measure A, radical treatment + drug prophylaxis; measure B, radical treatment + mosquito control; and measure C, wet/dry rotation system. Method Malaria incidence >10/10 000 is regarded as malaria prevalence,>1/10 000~≤10/10 000 as malaria control and ≤1/10 000 as malaria basic elimination. Results Measure A led to the elimination of falciparum and quantan malaria, the control of outbreak and decrease of incidence, measure B to the control of malaria and decrease the damage caused by malaria while measure C fundamentally changes the ecological environment of the vector and led to the incidence dropped to <1/10 000 for successive 8 years. Conclusion Wet/dry rotation system is a malaria control measure with sustained malaria control effectiveness.

关 键 词：四川 疟疾 防治措施 水旱轮作 可持续发展 

分 类 号：R531.301[医药卫生—内科学]