用指纹元素分析古汝瓷和古钧瓷的起源关系  

The fingerprint elements analysis on the provenance relation between ancient Chinese Ru porcelain and Jun porcelain

作　　者：赵维娟[1] 谢建忠[1] 李国霞[1] 高正耀[1] 李融武[2] 张斌[3] 冯松林[4] 黄忠祥[4] 贾秀琴[4] 韩松[4] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学物理工程学院,郑州450052 [2]北京师范大学物理系,北京100875 [3]郑州工业大学建筑系,郑州450003 [4]中国科学院高能物理研究所,北京100039

出　　处：《核技术》2002年第6期461-466,共6页Nuclear Techniques

基　　金：国家自然科学基金 (10 175 0 5 3);河南省自然科学基金 (0 0 40 5 15 0 0 );郑州大学青年基金资助

摘　　要：将古汝瓷、古钧瓷和现代汝瓷、现代钧瓷的釉和胎等 4 6个样品进行中子活化分析 (NAA) ,测定每个样品中的 36种元素含量 ,从中选取 8种指纹元素进行散布分析。结果表明 ,除少数样品外 ,古汝瓷和古钧瓷有着基本相同的原料来源 ,初步分析它们有相近的起源关系。现代钧瓷多数与古钧瓷相近 ;3个现代汝瓷和古汝瓷相似 ;景德镇瓷有别于所有其它样品。The 46 samples of glazes and bodies of the ancient Chinese Ru porcelain, Jun Porcelain and imitative porcelain were analyzed by neutron activation analysis (NAA). The contents of 36 elements for each sample were measured, the eight elements were chosen as the fingerprint elements to complete scatter analysis. The result showed that the ancient Chinese Ru porcelain and Jun porcelain had almost identical and stable sources of raw materials. The close provenance relation between ancient Chinese Ru porcelain and Jun porcelain was preliminarily verified. It is found that most modern Jun porcelain samples were similar to the ancient Chinese Jun porcelain, three modern Ru porcelain samples were similar to the ancient Chinese Ru porcelain. Jingdezhen porcelain has no relation to Ru porcelain and Jun porcelain.

关 键 词：中子活化分析 指纹元素 散布分析 起源关系 古汝瓷 古钧瓷 

分 类 号：K876.3[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] O657.4[历史地理—历史学]