在用车推行I/M制度的检测方法的成本效益分析  

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Inspection Procedure for I/M Program

作　　者：罗丽娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]东华大学环境科学与工程学院,上海200051

出　　处：《上海环境科学》2002年第7期401-404,共4页Shanghai Environmental Sciences

基　　金："九五"国家科技攻关专题;编号96-910-03-03

摘　　要：从检测性能和成本效益两方面对几种检测方法进行分析比较,并结合国内外I/M制度的实施情况和上海市的特点,建议上海市实施.I/M制度时,初期对轻型汽油车采用VMAS,后期采用IM240进行检测;对轻型柴油车可采用瞬态简易工况法和Lugdown系统。In this paper,comparison of the inspection equip- ment character and cost-effectiveness of different in-spection procedures were presented, According to the operation of I/M program in other cities at home and abroad and the characteristics of Shanghai, it was suggested that Shanghai should adopt ASM+VMAS to light-duty gasoline vehicles in the begining and adopt IM240 when have enough experiences. To light-duty diesel vehicles, it was suggested that ASM+VMAS(or IM240)and Lugdown compound system should be adopted.

关 键 词：I/M制度 检测方法 成本效益分析 机动车 维修制度 上海 汽车 尾气排放 

分 类 号：X－652[环境科学与工程] X701