检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙颖浩[1] 王林辉[1] 廖国强[1] 许传亮[1] 戚晓升[1] 高旭[1] 杨庆[1] 邱镇[1] 钱松溪[1]
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学附属长海医院泌尿外科,上海200433
出 处:《中华泌尿外科杂志》2002年第6期338-339,共2页Chinese Journal of Urology
摘 要:目的 探讨螺旋形双J管在复杂输尿管结石ESWL中的应用价值。 方法 对 97例复杂性输尿管结石患者ESWL术前分别放置普通双J管 (对照组 4 5例 )和螺旋形双J管 (治疗组 5 2例 ) ,观察比较ESWL疗效。 结果 对照组平均ESWL次数为 4 .2次 ,治疗组为 3.8次 (P <0 .0 5 )。对照组结石一次粉碎率 2 0 .0 % ,治疗组 2 3.1% (P <0 .0 5 )。对照组平均排石时间为 10 .5周 ,治疗组为 8.5周 (P <0 .0 1) ,两组比较差别均有显著性意义。Objective To evaluate the use of spiral Double J stent in the treatment of complica ted ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods Spiral Double J stent was inserted in 52 patients with complicated ureteral calculi before ESWL,and the conventional Double J stent was inserted in 45 patients as control. Results In the control group,the number of ESWLprocedures was 4.2,while in spiral Double J stent group,it was 3.8( P <0.05).The fragmentation rates with a single procedure was 20.0% in control group and 23.1%( P <0.05) in the spiral Double J stent group.The average stoneclearance time was 10.5 weeks in the control group and 8.5 weeks( P <0.01) in spiral Double J stent group. Conclusions The spiral Double J stent has been better than conventional Double J stent in the treatment of complicated ureteral calculi with ESWL.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28