检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡桂平[1]
机构地区:[1]蚌埠市第三人民医院微创外科,安徽蚌埠233000
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2016年第5期105-106,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
摘 要:目的:探讨综合护理干预用于肠造口周围皮肤损伤控制临床效果。方法:以2012年1月-2015年12月收治的肠造口周围皮肤损伤患者共80例作为研究对象,采用随机抽样法分为对照组(40例)和观察组(40例),分别给予常规创面处理和在此基础上加用综合护理干预;比较两组患者皮肤损伤控制效果、治疗前后SDS评分和SAS评分等。结果:观察组患者皮肤损伤控制效果显著优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后SDS评分和SAS评分均显著低于对照组、干预前(P<0.05)。结论:综合护理干预用于肠造口周围皮肤损伤可有效提高控制效果,改善负面心理状态,具有临床应用价值。Objective:To investigate the control effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on skin damage around the stoma. Methods:80 patients with skin damage around the stoma were chosen in the period from January 2012 to December 2015 in hospital and randomly divided into two groups including control group(40 patients) with conventional wound treatment and observation group(40 patients) with comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of control group; and the control effect of skin injury, SDS score and SAS score before and after treatment of both groups were compared. Results:The control effect of skin injury of observation group was significant better than control group(P<0.05). The SDS score and SAS score after intervention of observation group was significant better than control group and before intervention(P<0.05). Conclusion:Comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with skin damage around the stoma can efficiently higher the control effect and improve the negative psychological state.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112