检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江南[1]
出 处:《复旦学报(社会科学版)》2002年第4期116-123,共8页Fudan Journal(Social Sciences)
摘 要:文学史既有的研究成果一般性地说明了《大公报》“文艺”副刊 (1 93 3— 1 93 7)是三十年代京派文学的重要阵地 ,新闻史尚未藉重这一个例来丰富《大公报》办报思想的说明。本文试图做一些补缺工作 ,即从现代中国自由主义思想角度将《大公报》“文艺”副刊与京派文学作出共相对应的梳理 ,阐明两者都分享着共同的社会与思想资源。着重评述京派文学基植于思想自由 ,并由“人性论”与“距离说”所涵盖的艺术特征 ,从而揭示其自由主义文学标本的历史地位。The available researches in the history of literature have come to the general agreement that the literature and art supplement to 'Da Gong Bao' (1933-1937) was a very important field of Beijing style literature in the 1930's. In the history of journalism, this historical fact has not yet claimed enough attention in illustrating the guideline in running 'Da Gong Bao'. This paper attempts to make up for this by a synchronic examination of the Literature and Art Supplement to 'Da Gong Bao' and Beijing style literature from the angle of modern Chinese liberalism and explain that both of them shared common social and ideological resources. This paper focuses on the fact that Beijing style literature was based on ideological freedom, and shows the historical status of literature samples of liberalism characterized by its artistic features involving 'human nature' and 'theory of distance'.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117