检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2002年第3期268-273,共6页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:郭明瑞教授编著<中国物权法草案建议稿及说明>;山东省社会科学规划基金项目"担保优先权"(项目编号 :0 1S118)的相关研究成果
摘 要:在“物必有体”的传统民法原则掩盖下 ,权利客体具有无体性的知识产权当然地被排除在物权范畴之外。然而 ,在将知识产品与物、知识产权与所有权对比后可以发现 ,知识产品与物在本质上是相同的 ,知识产权从属性上讲与物权并无牛氐牾之处。因此 ,以是否“有体”作为划分物与权利标准的做法已经不合理了 ,而应以“纯粹客体性”和“实在性”取而代之。在此基础上 ,应当以知识产品为中心 ,参照物权体系构造一个大于知识产权的知识产品权体系 ,以加强对知识产品权的保护 ,完善民法和知识产权法的理论体系。Concealed by the principle of traditional civil law, property must be tangible and intellectual property is excluded from the property law. Comparing intellectual product with property and intellectual property with property right, we'll find that intellectual product is property in essence and intellectual property is just a kind of property. So it is not reasonable to differentiate property from right by being tangible or intangible, which should be replaced by pure objective and reality.A system of intellectual product right should be established, which is more extensive than intellectual property according to the system of property. It follows that we should enforce the protection of intellectual product right and improve the theoretical system of civil law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145