冰箱CFCs及其替代物的温室效应和能耗温室效应比较  

Comparison of Greenhouse Effect and Energy Consuming for Refrigerator between CFCs and Alternatives for CFCs

作　　者：叶林顺[1] 汤心虎[1] 金腊华[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学环境工程系,广州510632

出　　处：《制冷》2002年第2期37-40,共4页Refrigeration

摘　　要：本文研究了冰箱 CFCs在两种替代方案下从 1995年到 2 0 2 5年的不同时间尺度的直接温室效应和冰箱耗电间接排放 CO2 的间接温室效应。结果表明 ,这两种替代方案的直接温室效应都比间接温室效应显著地小。这两种替代方案的直接温室效应主要是由被完全替代前的 CFCs引起的。替代方案 1的冰箱能耗增加不能超过 10 % ,否则间接温室效应的增加抵消了替代后的直接温室效应的降低。从环境角度分析 ,替代方案 2优于替代方案The direct green house effects (DGHEs) under two substitutive scenarios for CFCs and the indirect green house effects(IGHEs)of energy consuming for refrigerator were researched from 1995 to 2025.The results showed that DGHEs of the two scenarios were remarkably less than IGHEs every year. DGHEs of the two scenarios mainly resulted from the remaining CFCs. The energy consuming of refrigerator under the scenario 1 can't be higher 10% than under no replacement, otherwise the increase of IGHEs offsets the decrease of DAGHEs after the substitution. The scenario 2 is prior to the scenario 1 according to the environmental effect of the two scenarios.

关 键 词：CFCS 冰箱 氟氯烃 替代物 能耗 温室效应 制冷剂 

分 类 号：TB64[一般工业技术—制冷工程] TM925.21[电气工程—电力电子与电力传动]